Talk:Japanese destroyer Ume (1944)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 18:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 05:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

I have generally found the articles nominated by Sturmvogel 66 to be of high quality and this looks of a similar nature. It will complete my review shortly. simongraham (talk) 05:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

This looks in very good shape. Earwig reports a 3.8% chance of violation, which is very impressive. Spot checks confirm Stille and Sturton.

A few comments:
 * Please change the numbers less than ten to words as per MOS:NUMERAL such as "5 additional".
 * Suggest abbreviating "127-millimeter", "25-millimeter", "610-millimeter" etc.
 * I generally prefer to spell them out. If nothing else than to remind people that they need to be hyphenated in that format.
 * As there does not seem to be any guidance on this, I am happy to accept that argument.
 * The final paragraph before the Battle of Ormoc Bay ends with "She would then..." Suggest adding a sentence to explain whether this happened in reality.

Please ping me when you would like me to look over this again. simongraham (talk) 13:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review; see if my changes are acceptable.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Nice to get a quick review. I believe the article meets the criteria to be a Good Article. simongraham (talk) 14:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Pass simongraham (talk) 14:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)