Talk:Japanese idol/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 06:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello lullabying, I'll take up the review for this nomination and present it to you, shortly. I hope you will find my feedback to be useful and that I will learn something new in the process. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 06:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I have completed the review and it appears to be to meet the good article criteria on nomination. I couldn't find any significant issues so I'm going to promote it, though I have left some comments below, mostly suggestions. Excellent work on the article and congratulations on your successful nomination! Tayi Arajakate  Talk 21:57, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments

 * I would suggest bundling citations when a line needs a lot of citations (3+). There are a lot of these cases in the article.
 * Suggest renaming the section on sub-categories to "sub-category markets" otherwise it gives an impression that it is a section on "types" encompasses all idols and without overlaps. The section should also come somewhere after "History", generally articles tend to have "Definition" or an equivalent followed by "History".
 * The sources listed in the "Sources" section don't appear to be used in the article itself? They should be incorporated into the article if they aren't, and if they already are, they need to be present as in-line citations.
 * Thank you! I have done all three. lullabying (talk) 14:43, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Assessment
 Comprehension: The article is very well written.

Verifiability: The article is verifiable.

Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive enough.

Neutrality: The article is neutral.

Stability: The article is stable. Illustration: The article is very well illustrated.

