Talk:Japanese ironclad Ryūjō/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 06:24, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

This is good shape. A few comments: That's all I have, placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:03, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * should this be at Japanese corvette Ryūjō? Or at least have a redirect from that title? If a move isn't appropriate, perhaps change armoured to ironclad in the first sentence and infobox to reflect the title?
 * ironclad or armoured corvette should appear somewhere early in the body
 * in Note 1, quote→quoted
 * you could link propeller
 * you could lk=on to link kW
 * the sentence beginning "All of which" doesn't have a subject
 * is there a calibre available for the 70-pounder guns?
 * Not that I can find, All of the London Ordnance Works' guns are not well documented.
 * suggest "for the price of 270,000 gold Ryō on 12 April. The domain renamed it Ryōshō"
 * what are/were Ryōshō and Ryūjō? Could you provide a translation or meaning?
 * The latter's meaning is in the lede. Lemme look for the former.
 * No joy on a translation for Ryosho. Google translate on the ship's article on Japenese wiki wasn't helpful either.
 * link sloop-of-war
 * and she was transferred to the Tōkai Naval Station
 * say Tōkai Naval Station was at Yokohama, I believe that is correct at that time
 * 12 September 18 7 94 to 17 February 1895
 * the ref anchors aren't working because the sfn's don't have the year of publication
 * If I needed to disambiguate the notes, I'd have added them! Just another reason to despise sfn/harv formats.
 * author-link Thomas Brassey, 1st Earl Brassey
 * File:Japanese Ironclad warship Ryujo.jpg needs info about its publication, it is unclear
 * same goes for File:RyujoAndHorse.jpg
 * Added note stating no known US publication to both images. The Japanese license is either or, not both.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:32, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Almost all of these are done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:32, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * All done. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:46, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries, a pleasure. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by acceptably licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:41, 12 July 2020 (UTC)