Talk:Japanese post in Korea

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Japanese post in Korea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071027230605/http://www.yushu.or.jp/english/e_article/korean/p01.html to http://yushu.or.jp/english/e_article/korean/p01.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071027230605/http://www.yushu.or.jp/english/e_article/korean/p01.html to http://yushu.or.jp/english/e_article/korean/p01.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:18, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Article scope
I feel like the title implies an inclusion of the postal system post-1905, yet the current article implies 1876–1905. Either a rename or a rescope in the article should eventually happen (if it ever does) toobigtokale (talk) 08:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * This is not an area I really know anything about but Korea under Japanese rule appears to indicate you are correct that expansion is needed beyond 1905. If you can find sufficient sources and are willing to take it on you can certainly do this to the betterment of the article. Your edit contributions certainly show you have the experience for this. Good luck. ww2censor (talk) 10:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm unlikely to take it up; not really in my interest area and my todo list is long. Just bringing it to the attention of future readers. toobigtokale (talk) 10:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * That's a pity but I disagree with your reassessment as a stub class article which generally applies to an article of just a few sentences, so start-class is correct for now. I will revert that. Good luck. ww2censor (talk) 11:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Stub class also measures number of sources. This has just one source to a single claim. Think of an extreme example; what if an article is really really long but only has one source on a single sentence? This is a stub; it's also not even that long in the first place. toobigtokale (talk) 11:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)