Talk:Jar with a Twist

Contested deletion
I am very confused as to why this is up for CSD. There's no promotional language in here at all, let alone being unambiguous spam. It's even being prepped for a DYK. I would like the nominator to explain their reasoning behind the CSD tag; I can't bring myself to understand it. There's a section describing it and a section with WP:RS talking about it. No spam in sight. Dea db  eef  12:00, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

I mean, even if you consider the entire press section to be promotional (which I do not) and blanked it entirely (which you shouldn't), the fact remains that there would be a substantial stub left over which is still covered extensively by independent reliable sources. Read the bottom of your db template: Nor does this criterion apply where substantial encyclopedic content would remain after removing the promotional material; in this case please remove the promotional material yourself, or add the advert tag to alert others to do so. This article would easily pass AFD, never mind be eligible for CSD. Dea db  eef  12:20, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations
....on a DYK! Amandajm (talk) 03:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * ...Thank you! Dea  db  eef  03:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

History and design
The phrase "the more primary problem" seems to me to be a modification of an absolute. I think a simple "the primary problem" is better. i will wait a bit before editing. Kcor53 (talk) 13:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Good point, I changed it myself.  04:04, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * My man! Kcor53 (talk) 13:18, 6 August 2015 (UTC)