Talk:Jason Nelson

[Untitled]
The entry has been enhanced with additional sources to add to the validity of the article. And therefore the Ad Tag was removed. We will continue to rewrite the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.167.17.201 (talk) 10:41, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

I like how you have short easy easy to read paragraphs. I like the titles and the layout of your page. --157.182.79.225 (talk) 18:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

comment from Lauren Epstein
I think your page is nicely set up. I like how you have the Image of Jason Nelson and I like the format and structure of your page. I would add alittle bit more content but overall good start and good job!

I think this page has a very good step-up and is very easy to read. The information is presented in a fair, neutral way. Great job!Erinrebeccalong (talk) 18:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Your layout is logical. The information is clear and concise for the topic, and it is relevant to the topic. There is room to expand as his career will expand. Great job, group.--Marie.rafa (talk) 18:44, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I would reverse education and background. I'd put education first after the lead paragraph. Also, I'd probably retitle it Biography and move or repeat the biographical info from the lead paragraph. Is there a reference for the quotes in background? Is it from his email - even that's fine. Put it in a reference, list it as "personal communication with Jason Nelson" and the date, or something like that.--Sandybaldwin (talk) 18:45, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I think your picture is very professional and impressive. Good start. Under background it says cyperpoet..not cyberpoet. Fix for grammar and it'll be great. --Etoile bleu (talk) 18:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Overall, a very informative article. Good Job! Askeens (talk) 18:48, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I think the page breakdown is done very well. The subtopics help guide the reader through the information, and it is also easier to navigate to the information you want to read about. Also nice use of graphic. AliBento (talk) 18:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

This is a very professional page. I think the format is amazing and definitely easy to follow. No specific comments or recommendations great as is! --Amurray8 (talk) 18:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

It's a nice, general article. The highlight for me was the title of his works, Game, Game, Game and More Game..or something to that effect; and also that he teaches Cyberstudies. I think you included interesting facts about him as well as pertinent facts about his life and works. There's room to expand, though there may not be a need to. Rapenich (talk) 18:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I think this looks like a really good article so far. The info is really good and I like the pic. Good job!

Jadams19 (talk) 18:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Under the "Style" section, you might want to break up the three styles into subheadings using one three (?) equal signs on each side. Cara.folk (talk) 18:56, 28 February 2008 (UTC)