Talk:Jassi Khangura

... i'm not the creator but I have put a lot of info on this page. At the top it still says "multiple issues" but only lists lack of articles linking to it. I accept there are few linking to it, but how can I remove the phrase "multiple issues"? Is it also still a "stub"? Surely it's better than a stub now? How do I get it's classification reviewed? QR 09:28, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Untitled

 * The tags issue has been answered further down the page. I have left your rating as C-class as it is definitevily not a Stub and probably not a Start… however i must stress there are still issues with this article. Cheers,  benzband  ( talk ) 20:13, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Comments by creator of article
This summary has been prepared with help of www.qilaraipur.org.

This data is not fake, content of this page is true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taruna Jindal (talk • contribs) 11:21, 11 June 2009 This article is neutral. I don't understand why it's tagged as neutrality disputed. How can I get this removed or get the page assessed by someone? Links to the page I understand, but not neutrality query. It's definite fact about this individual. QR 09:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC)


 * You can ask to get get the page assessed at Peer Review. Also, the multiple issues tag is only to be used when there are actually several tags; so yes, if an article is tagged  you can convert it to  . However i think this article needs a bit of copyediting, so i have tagged it for cleanup. Cheers,  benzband  ( talk ) 19:52, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Jassi Khangura.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion
Image is in public domain as is noted on the page jassi_khangura.jpg. Should not be speedy deleted QR 05:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qilaraipur (talk • contribs)

image marked for auto deletion and do not know how to contest. Marked as public domain but no replacement of image. Likewise page has markers of questionable content, lack of links etc. There are many links added in recent weeks. how to get these markers deleted from top of page? Page is impartial and accurate and links are good and to very reputable sources. QR 07:13, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The image is no longer tagged for deletion, and the copyright status looks good. Looks all fine to me.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail 13:11, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

- page is good but has warnings at top about lack of links and citations - both of which there are lots of. How to get these flagged/tagged items removed as they are out of date by a year. QR 14:39, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * What you need to do is edit the Multiple issues tag at the top of the article and remove the appropriate portion. I've done that for the "BLP sources = March 2011" part now, which removed the citations message, but I've left the "orphan = April 2010" tag which is the one about the links. The problem is that there are very few other articles that link to this one (it's not about the number of links within this article) - in fact, other than User pages, Talk pages and a WP page, there is only one incoming link. You can see what articles link to it by using the "What links here" tool in the Toolbox in the column over on the left of the page. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jassi Khangura. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130508085551/http://www.indian-elections.com/assembly-elections/punjab/election-result-07.html to http://www.indian-elections.com/assembly-elections/punjab/election-result-07.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:43, 22 November 2017 (UTC)