Talk:Java War (1741–1743)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 17:48, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:48, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow that was quick. Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:58, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Was moved to Java War (1741–1743). Seems to be an en-dash thing, so considering the arbcom case and sanctions I'm not going to get involved. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:42, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * How can you regain greater control? They can gain or assert, but not regain. Nove: on 7 October 1740 after revolted. Two "following day" in quick succession, reword.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * How is imposing a curfew related to crushing the revolt? Isn't that something separate?
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * I've fixed the grammar and logic issues you have already mentioned. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)