Talk:Jawa Moto

Geography, how active
1) The Czech Republic/Czechoslovakia is not in Eastern Europe but in Central Europe.

2) Jawa began producing motorcycles before Czechoslovakia found itself in "Eastern Europe" (in the communist block.) Therefore I do not understand the relevance of the statement: "the most active East-European manufacturers." for ever bike for ever values —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.21.49.162 (talk) 08:58, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

3) Is it fair to say that Jawa were more active as a factory than MZ?


 * The entire article is missing citations and footnotes, so there is probably lots of problematic information in there. If you know of reliable sources, please do use them to correct the article.--Dbratland (talk) 16:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

4) Jawa mopeds now have a fairly poor reputation, due to the difficulty of getting replacement parts, and the high failure rate of the "Tranizmo" unit. This is absolutely not true! You can build a Babetta with new parts (mostly Chinese). It is quiet popular in Slovakia, Czech Republic, and Hungary. The "Tranzimo" unit is so reliable, that people use it in other motorbikes (e.g. Simson), and still in production. I can give only Hungarian sources for that, but only web-shops (advertisement?). --Bmateusz (talk) 18:44, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved by nominator to "Jawa Moto" as an uncontroversial move. DrKiernan (talk) 15:58, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Jawa Motors → JAWA Moto – Official name is JAWA Moto, official page Jirka.h23 (talk) 12:54, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Considering that 90% of the article content is about the historical company, perhaps a simple redirect is more appropriate? Especially considering that the longevity of the new company is questionable. — Brianhe (talk) 16:03, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * What do you mean a simple redirect? Jawa leads to an disambiguation page. Would you better support JAWA (company) ?Jirka.h23 (talk) 16:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I mean JAWA Moto, the name of the new company, should redirect to the existing article, which is mostly about the historical company but has a paragraph about the new one. — Brianhe (talk) 16:41, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * But the historical company is not Jawa Motors, but JAWA, do you please understand now? I suggest JAWA Moto or JAWA (company). Thak you for you reply.Jirka.h23 (talk) 21:40, 22 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose per WPMOS-not an acronym.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose to what? JAWA Moto or JAWA (company)? "Jawa Motors" is just nothing. Jirka.h23 (talk) 16:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose to either miscapitalization.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:03, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * So you disagree only with uppercase letters? Ok, so what would you support Jawa Moto or Jawa (company)? Name Jawa Motors does not exist. Thak you for you reply. Jirka.h23 (talk) 08:18, 23 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Move to Jawa Moto. There is no reason not to use the WP:OFFICIALNAME here, unless and until there's an encyclopedic reason to fork the topic into separate article on the current business entity and what it was before restructuring, which is unlikely. We always prefer natural disambiguation over parenthetical when possible.  There aren't any of the WP:CRITERIA that militate against using Jawa Moto.  Per MOS:TM and MOS:CAPS, don't emulate stylization from logos and other trademarks, which is all this "JAWA" capitalization is (it's brand-projection emphasis).  The name is not an acronym, it's  contracted abbreviation of the founder's name.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  06:46, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok, i waited for answers one more day. Now i am moving it to 'Jawa Moto' with lowercase. Jirka.h23 (talk) 08:10, 25 August 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Revolution of Indian motor cycle's
By Vansh Tomar 103.62.94.180 (talk) 17:29, 14 May 2021 (UTC)