Talk:Jay Bouwmeester/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * One of the better written articles I've seen on a contemporary athlete.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Everything is cited, and all cites are properly formatted with Template:Cite web
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Summarizes concisely, doesn't dwell too much on anything.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Reviewer: ~DC Let's Vent 03:06, 11 September 2010 (UTC)