Talk:Jay Tuck

"Multiple Issues"
Hi People,

I am Jay Tuck. This Wikipedia article was forwarded to me for checking and all facts are correct. The "multiple issues" that some editor seems to find in the article are extremely embarrassing to me. Makes it look like Wikipedia thinks my vita is in some way not valid.

To the specifics:

Citations for verification: There are 20 footnotes and references in the article, validating nearly every single fact. These are reliable sources, including New York Times, London Speakers Bureau, German Chamber of Commerce and Der Spiegel. There are numerous other verifiations from top mainstream news magazines and televison stations in the German version (see Wikipedia German Jay Tuck). The German version, by the way, has no "issues". I am very well known here.

Appears like an advertisement: This I do not understand. There are only facts in the article, no exagerations, opinions or praise.

Bare URLs: In an original version of the article, there were bare URLs. No longer.

Orphan: This article is NOT an orphan, there are others linking to it - both in the German and the English language Wikipedias.

These "multiple issue" tags are not only incorrect, they are damaging to my reputation. I would much appreciate your corrections.

Thank you much for your understanding,

Jay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuckjay (talk • contribs) 12:44, 29 October 2012 (UTC)