Talk:Jaynes–Cummings model

ħν?
Im not sure about this, so i don't want to make any changes myself, but it seems strange that ν (nu), generally used as the symbol for frequency is being used to represent an angular frequency. Wouldn't ω1 and ω2 or something similar be better? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.216.54.172 (talk) 20:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

yeah, it is worrysome
I was also thinking about that. One should use different notations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farid2053 (talk • contribs) 06:55, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Not Standard
ω is the standard character used in the literature. This article seems pretty mess too. If I get the time I'm inclined to rewrite this. --129.11.77.198 (talk) 08:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Minus missing
Okay, I have no idea how editing stuff works, but comapared to Cohen-Tannoudji there should be a minus in the arctan. So someone might want to change: arctan(...) -> arctan(- ...)

134.60.83.75 (talk) 16:34, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Merger proposal
It seems the Jaynes-Cummings model page is essentially a duplicate of this page, with a misspelling (“-” instead of “–”). The content is slightly different, but I am pretty certain the same model is being referred to on both pages. The title figure is even the same. There is some non-duplicate content, though, so that might be merged in somehow, and notation would probably have to be made consistent throughout. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MYT (talk • contribs) 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I merged the two articles. I also shifted the "Articles for creation" tag here because it was originally C-class. Not sure if its the right procedure but I think once this article is cleaned up it should be C-class too. AquaDTRS (talk) 22:06, 7 August 2018 (UTC)