Talk:Jean-Claude Mézières/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:26, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * Ref #3, ref #25 , ref #9 (Google cache) and one EL  are dead. ✅
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * {http://ludogrid.free.fr/} is not an RS; ✅
 * c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects):
 * b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Some referencing issues to be fixed as per above. On hold. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC) ✅
 * I think that's all fixed now. - Joe King (talk)
 * OK, keep GA status, thanks for your hard work. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Some referencing issues to be fixed as per above. On hold. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC) ✅
 * I think that's all fixed now. - Joe King (talk)
 * OK, keep GA status, thanks for your hard work. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Some referencing issues to be fixed as per above. On hold. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC) ✅
 * I think that's all fixed now. - Joe King (talk)
 * OK, keep GA status, thanks for your hard work. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)