Talk:Jean Marc Calvet

Untitled
I believe this article is very relevant. Calvet is an exceptional talent and a notable up and coming contemporary artist. His personal story is completely relevant to his art itself as it is this, his past, which wholly influences his painting, also the reason he became an artist. If I understand correctly what is required by Wikipedia, I will add this week more information on his technique, his rise in the art world and so on. If there is anything else required, please let me know and I will provide it. Thank you very much! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abrahams2010 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 2 June 2010
 * What is needed is to assert notability, especially under WP:ARTIST, by means of posting reliable sources. -- Alexf(talk) 20:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I have removed all the personal biographical description of his past. I hope the article is now acceptable? (The main source was my own detailed research with Calvet over the last 4 years, but the work has not yet been published so I cannot cite my own work or research as a source). Can I upload images, a photograph of him and some of his paintings? (I have copyright clearance for all the work and photographs) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abrahams2010 (talk • contribs) 16:29, 3 June 2010


 * You may only upload images for which you own the copyright. Any copyrighted images -- such as artworks -- can only be used when specifically granted for use in Wikipedia by the copyright owner (that is, the artist). The official procedure is for granting permission is outlined at Donating copyrighted materials. After permission has been received by the Wikimedia Foundation WP:OTRS office, then the images can be used. — Cactus Writer |   needles  07:00, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. The article has been 'cleaned up' and I believe it now to be very neutral. I have also previously removed all biographcal description for which any further citations were required (see above re. my resarch int the subject). Can the two '!' wikipedia concerns now be removed by the article? Is it now acceptable? If not, could you tell me what else is required. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.39.156.117 (talk) 07:17, 4 June 2010 (UTC)