Talk:Jeans (film)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 01:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jeans film.jpg
Image:Jeans film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Comments before GA review
Not that I will be conducting the GA review, but I'd like to point out that the article presently carries 5 non-free fair use images. That is way too high these days IMO. I would suggest you cutting down on the screenshots from the film and retain utmost 2 of them. My two cents. Great work on this. Mspraveen (talk) 03:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. I've kept two screenshots, one poster, and one production still. Gettin rid of another, will make it less "complete" for a GA, considering getting more infomation is hard on a 1998 Tamil film. Thanx. Universal Hero (talk)
 * I still see four images :O Mspraveen (talk) 04:09, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Another point for the soundtrack section: song titles go in quotes (rather than italics) and album titles go in italics. Nikki 311  22:44, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Done. Thanx. Universal Hero (talk) 17:31, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Dubious budget figure
This article gives the budget for the film as $4 million (19 crore rupees then at exchange rate of $1 = 40 rupees) based on a singular interview given by the director. I believe this figure is nonsensical considering that this was the fourth film for the director and his biggest hit until then was Indian released in 1996 which grossed about $6 million. Also, Rajinikanth's Padayappa released in 1999 grossing $7 million and was widely reported in the vernacular media as the biggest hit in Tamil film industry in the 20th century. I however agree that this film was the biggest hit in Prashanth's career.

Anwar (talk) 08:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * For the moment, I suppose we listen to sources and let it be as its is believed in popular belief. Universal Hero (talk) 11:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Is that an excuse? I am not saying the film is a flop. I am saying the scope was limited than you think. If the film grossed more than 30 - 40 crores as you think, Prashanth would be crowned as superstar in 1998. Just think before beginning a revert war again. Anwar (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The values by Dinakaran (your usual source) are speculated. Furthermore they often chnage varying to their likes and dislikes. Moreover, some avlues only count Chennai or Tamil Nadu and ignore the Indian and verseas values. I'm sure that Jeans's market stretched to the USA and the Far East. Universal Hero (talk) 11:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

"Jeans 2 (flim)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jeans 2 (flim). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Citation 24 & 25
Citation 24 and 25 are repeated.😷 Great standard of wikipedia editing. 😂😂😂 The idea of editing is getting worsened as the days progress. Kpbolumbu (talk) 18:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)