Talk:Jedi Religion

How can an encyclopdia give information on everything when it is not giving something a chance. There are a great ammount of people out there that follow the jedi path and call it as such. Simply because it is not mainstream mean its any more or less real then any other religon. For example: say that one does not belive in christanity, therefore would the view upon that from one's own self be ficticious? Yes, but will it be allowed here of course. There are as I said a great many people out there that follow the Jedi path. We are people too and it is our belief system. There will be a history of it if it exsists on Wikeipedia or not. I hope it gets kept on the page you can put a warning at the top that its religous, or a belief system rather then literal fact if you wish like the tetragrammaton page has things disputed within it. Wouldn't this be the same case?
 * The main problem is the article seems to be made up entirely original research. Please see WP:V and WP:NOR Bige1977 17:56, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It can only be kept if there are references provided as to where it has appeared in print, on websites etc (not just blogs). Wiki isn't the place for your own personal ideas.
 * Tyrenius 15:45, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

This is from websites there listed at the bottom of the page. I have added news-paper articals about it. There are many people who belive in these things. Please don't subject us to religious discrimination.
 * I've removed the text of the news articles, as they are copyrighted. By all means reference them (see WP:CITE for ways of doing this) - citing sources appropriately may save this article from deletion. Heycos 02:03, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

AfD
This article survived a AfD debate due to no consensus. The debate can be found here. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 10:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC)