Talk:Jeff Chapman (politician)

Untitled
The entire article reads like campaign promotional material. A candidate polling at around 4% surely doesn't deserve of page of this depth either.

This article was obviously written by people connected to the campaign, and until the article undergoes a substantial revision in tone and balance, the banner of questionable neutrality needs to remain on this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.166.222.219 (talk) 03:16, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Response: This article is clearly marked as that of a politician and has the "relevant" wikipedia warning. Your comment makes assumptions that, though they are very likely to be true, add no constructive information on how to improve the article. If you have information or data that might enhance the neutrality of this article, then please share it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hcdixon (talk • contribs) 12:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:34, 9 July 2013 (UTC)