Talk:Jeff Horn

Latest entry for fight record
There seems to be a fight listed for March 2016, which has now passed and no result posted. Was this fight due to take place or is it an error?
 * The fight was postponed due to Jeff Horn suffering an injury in training, and no one updated the article. The fight will subsequently be taking place in an hour and 20 minutes from now as I write this. I may enter result details at a later stage, once the fight has taken place. 110.140.193.164 (talk) 07:41, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Pacquiao fight
Is it acceptable to emphasise the loaded term "controversial" in the lead of this article? Sources or otherwise (and not all outlets/personalities have deemed it controversial), it smacks of POV to me and borders on violating WP:BLPSTYLE. User:Ohio girl insists (without edit summaries) that "controversial" be present, and she has reverted other users too, so I guess she's not in a collaborative mood yet. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 21:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The word "controversial" is not loaded nor is it POV or partisan, it is merely the word used by the vast majority of reliable sources to describe the event. The bout and its decision undoubtedly caused considerable controversy; it would be suspicious to conceal this fact. Ohio girl (talk) 23:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Ohio girl's edits are troll attempts. Almost every edit is a anti-white/pro-asian edit from her. Deal with her edits in the same way that you would deal with any other trolling. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 09:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * What a disgusting personal attack. You should be ashamed for making such outrageous assumptions. Ohio girl (talk) 09:53, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Don't be silly, it's not a personal attack. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 09:56, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * You are clearly unhinged if you are playing the race card this quickly. I recommend you seek help and take a break from editing. Ohio girl (talk) 09:59, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I'm here to discuss article content - not trade insults. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 10:03, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * You don't get to play innocent when you wildly accuse someone of being racist just because they make edits you don't like. Ohio girl (talk) 10:08, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I have no idea if you're racist or not. I don't care if you're racist or not. I commented on your edits, not your motivation. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 10:11, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Please. You called me a troll and then claimed that I have a racial agenda (which ironically only served to expose your own racial agenda). Your comments have been nothing but baseless personal attacks. Ohio girl (talk) 10:15, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Enough. I have explained that I attacked your edits, not you. If you can't/won't understand that, then we have nothing more to talk about on that subject. See ya. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 10:22, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Nice cop-out. You showed your character, and it ain't pretty. Ohio girl (talk) 10:25, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Anyway, the word "controversial" has been removed from the article. It is still visible in the names of a couple of the sources. HiLo48 (talk) 06:40, 9 June 2018 (UTC)