Talk:Jeff Landry

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jeff Landry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106024829/http://staticresults.sos.louisiana.gov/1122010_Congressional.html to http://staticresults.sos.louisiana.gov/1122010_Congressional.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:28, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Gulf War service
Although Landry served in the National Guard during the Gulf War era, no reliable sources found as of yet state that he served in the war zone during the war. Accordingly, Category:American military personnel of the Gulf War was removed from the article for now until a reliable ref is found. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 11:39, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 15:19, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

When you were younger, were you ever on NET ministries?
Did you stay at our house? 209.205.144.221 (talk) 15:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Permitless carry
Landry signed legislation abolishing Louisiana's permit requirement for the concealed carrying of firearms. The straightforward, accurate way to describe this is "legislation allowing the carrying of concealed weapons without a permit." I have reverted an edit that describes this as "constitutional carry" legislation. This is a slanted phrase used by supporters of such legislation (i.e., the gun-rights movement). Its use implies that permit requirements are unconstitutional (which is a contested claim). The best sources avoid it. See, e.g.:


 * Bill allowing permitless concealed carry in Louisiana heads to the governor’s desk for signature (Associated Press) - the article describes the legislation repeatedly as "permitless concealed carry" and notes that "Supporters of the legislation" use the "constitutional carry bill" phrase
 * Bill to let people carry concealed guns without permits dies in Louisiana Legislature - describes legislation as "permitless carry laws" and notes that "constitutional carry" phrasing is used by supporters of the legislation.

--Neutralitytalk 15:36, 20 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The second source is not about the law mentioned in this article. It should be noted that several other reliable sources refer to the passed legislation as a constitutional carry law:
 * State lawmakers send constitutional carry bill to the governor
 * Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry signs constitutional carry
 * "Constitutional carry" itself does not appear to be a "slanted phrase" as it states on the Constitutional carry page:
 * "The phrase 'constitutional carry' reflects the fact that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution does not allow restrictions on gun rights, including the right to carry or bear arms."
 * Given that different sources refer to the law in different ways (constitutional carry, permitless carry, concealed carry) when linking the relevant page it would make sense to link the article using its official name (It should also be noted with that page there seems to have been a clear consensus that "Constitutional carry" is an appropriate title for the article). BlueShirtz (talk) 17:15, 20 July 2024 (UTC)


 * It's not an "official name"; its what supporters have dubbed the bill. The local TV stations seems like a notch lower in quality than the Associated Press, too. We should simply describe what the bill does, not use a phrase that intrinsically expresses a contested opinion about constitutional law. Neutralitytalk 17:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * It is the official name of the article. The local press publications linked above are still reliable sources and their use of the phrase must be considered. We should link the constitutional carry article using the article's official name. As stated in the previous entry, using "constitutional carry" is not an example of a slanted or biased phrase. BlueShirtz (talk) 19:36, 20 July 2024 (UTC)