Talk:Jeff Rowley

Absurdly overblown
This article has been turned into an absurdly oversized, glaringly promotional vanity page. I'm not sure where to start cutting this monstrosity back to a reasonable size, so I'll take a radical step and reduce it to a two-sentence stub. I invite re-expansion, within reasonable bounds.

The page author,, is advised to consult the WP:COI and WP:AUTOBIO guidelines before continuing to work on this article. They are also warned to stop misusing image description pages for advertising and promotion, as they did in several recent uploads. If they continue to misuse this project as a platform for their public relations efforts, they will be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:35, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

I've now read the Conflict of Interest Policy and now have a better appreciation of your concerns. I did not know about that policy prior to today, and think it would have been better if they had been sent with a more polite message, but I would like to move on and learn how I can contribute to an article about Jeff Rowley, and do so in compliance with guidelines. Can you suggest someone who might help me? Shacktown123

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jeff Rowley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120423110628/http://www.theweeklyreview.com.au/article-display/Million-dollar-baby/3968 to http://www.theweeklyreview.com.au/article-display/Million-dollar-baby/3968

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)