Talk:Jeff Stilwell

A neutral article, acceptable as an encyclopedic entry
I've cut a lot of the most blatantly non-neutral content, which had been accumulating here for over a year and a half--indications are that a WP:COI account has been editing this, and had beefed up sections with primary sources and promotional blurbs. The section on plays can also be pared, to perhaps one or two positive quotes and those plays that have received substantial coverage. I've requested more eyes at the BLP noticeboard. 2602:302:D89:D609:B15C:85A5:7132:56FD (talk) 20:28, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * After reading this, it seems likely that at least some of the content was copied from primary sources, and perhaps press releases. 2602:302:D89:D609:B15C:85A5:7132:56FD (talk) 20:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Reads like a self-serving autobiography, even after many cuts
I fail to understand how this pleasant local citizen belongs in Wikipedia. There is no evidence presented in the article that this person will leave any notable legacy.--Quisqualis (talk) 21:24, 11 December 2019 (UTC)