Talk:Jeffery P. Hopkins

Consensus/Federal judicial service
Okay show me where the consensus is to adapt the format that you say it has to be. Snickers2686 (talk) 18:56, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Being combative will not make this easier. MOS:BODY tells you everything you need to know. Stub-class articles do not need to be broken up into countless sections. It hurts readability and the human eye. It also doesn't make much sense to separate "career" and so-called "federal judicial service." This "service," is obviously a part of a judge's career. It does not represent a new phase of post-career judge-dom. I recall that, in the past, you edit-warred in violation of MOS:JOBTITLE. Eventually, you came around and realized that you were on the wrong side of a policy dispute. It happens. I suggest you do that again with this. Novemberjazz 21:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * That didn't answer my question. Where's the consensus? I love how it has to be your way or no way. Snickers2686 (talk) 21:15, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * There is policy. Novemberjazz 22:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)