Talk:Jehoshua Ben-Pandira

I think this should be merged into the Yeshu article under the ben-Pandera, ben-Stada section. Massey's views are highly POV and based on a series of rigid interpretations of the raw info which disregard other interpretations. Kuratowski&#39;s Ghost 11:50, 9 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Everbody's views are highly POV. The point is that it should be made known that this is one interpretation. I think a separate article is fine, especially considering Yeshu article length. You wanna censor via merging? You have links for criticism of Massey's work? -  max rspct   leave a message  12:27, 9 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The Yeshu article provides enough raw data for readers to spot obvious weaknesses in Massey's views, like the assumption that the Yeshu mentioned in connection with ben-Perachia is identical to Yeshu ben-Pandera and assumption that the Yeshu is short for Yehoshua. (The Yeshu article does currently lack info on evidence of interplay between the Gospels and early forms of the Toledot Yeshu, which needs to be included.) Kuratowski&#39;s Ghost 12:49, 10 April 2006 (UTC)