Talk:Jeju Olle Trail

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. A technical move, apparently uncontroversial. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Olle road → Jeju Olle Trail – The Jeju Olle Trail is never referred to as 'road' on the organization's website or in any of the print literature. Nobody calls it a road. Whoever wrote the original used one possible translation of the Korean word 'gil'. In this case, the correct translation is 'trail'. Additionally, the word 'road' implies that it is used by motor vehicles. The Jeju Olle Trail is explicitly intended only for walking.121.145.161.164 (talk) 02:40, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://english.visitkorea.or.kr/common/download/olle_contents_eng.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 17:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Editing Route 1 and Route 2
This wikipedia page has a 'flag' saying it read more like a guidebook/manual than an article, so I edited the Route 1 & 2 sections to read more like an article. Did this by combining the single line stats (such as distance and difficulty), into one succinct sentence. The difference can be seen by looking at the new Route 1 & 2 sections, and comparing it to the rest of the routes which I did not edit. Kerm22 (talk) 02:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Correction: I meant Route 1 and Route 1-1 were the two I edited Kerm22 (talk) 02:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Tone and guidebook writing
Please read WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:TONE; be mindful of writing like we're trying to "sell" the trail; such writing is subject to be removed (like I just did on a recent pass). Also on Wikipedia, it hurts your credibillity if you systemically write advert-like things. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 05:21, 16 June 2024 (UTC)