Talk:Jeni Bojilova-Pateva/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 18:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

I'll try to review this tomorrow.♦ Dr. Blofeld  18:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

"
 * Lede
 * "After graduating with teaching credentials she began her profession, but was barred from teaching when a law was passed limiting married women's rights. She turned to activism and journalism, becoming involved in the international women's movement." - dates? ✅ SusunW (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * " Her book В помощ на жената (To Help Women) -year? ✅ SusunW (talk) 13:36, 11 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Career


 * " began giving talks on the" -began as an orator for ? ✅ SusunW (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Italicize the names of the newspapers in English. "The situation of woman and child in Bulgaria" -should be capitalized as a title in English too. ✅ SusunW (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)


 * "In 1909, she published an article in the newspaper Ден (Day) arguing for women's emancipation and in 1910, " -and the following year? -to avoid being repetitive with citing dates. ✅ SusunW (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

" She is remembered, along with Anna Karima, as one of the "two most prominent leaders of the women's movement" in their era." -really? If it's a quote state who it's by. ✅ SusunW (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Legacy

Well done, nice to see you expanding existing articles too.♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:21, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, yes, as long as it isn't someone where drive-by trivial content is repeatedly added, I enjoy cleaning up articles. This one was a joy to do as I learned a lot while writing it. SusunW (talk) 14:03, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Nice one.♦ Dr. Blofeld  10:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)