Talk:Jenica Atwin

Crossing the floor
I've reverted the information about her crossinng the floor for now. While it seems likely to occur based on the sources, it has not (as of this post) yet officially happened. Ckatz talk  17:02, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

The official announcement may be occuring shortly as CBC's site appears to be standing by on a live feed with Liberal MP Dominic LeBlanc. Ckatz talk  17:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Wolastoq
This article mentions "Ron Tremblay, the Wolastoq Grand Chief". The redirect of the link to Wolastoq or a possible alternative term has recently been discussed on Talk:Wolastoq#Article_name. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 20:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

IP's preferred addition
I invite IP 99.106.93.88 to discuss their preferred addition here and gain consensus by persuading other editors rather than continuing to edit war. Thanks, Generalrelative (talk) 00:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

It is not a preferred addition. Half of a quote was cut off due to the reference used cutting it in half. I added the full quote but forgot to add the reference for it, several particularly slow people reverted it, I realized my mistake and added the reference. It is not language, it is accuracy. 99.106.93.88 (talk) 00:53, 3 March 2022 (UTC)


 * By several particularly slow people are you referring to ClueBot,, and me? And you think that name calling is going to be an effective way to persuade us that you were right all along (that is, those three of us who are not an anti-vandalism bot)? Since you may not yet be aware, I will inform you that WP:CIVILITY is required of those who wish to edit Wikipedia. It is not optional. Generalrelative (talk) 00:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I see that you are also at 4 reverts in the past 24 hours, in clear violation of WP:3RR. Please pay careful attention to our policy forbidding edit warring in the future. You may find it helpful to read WP:1AM as well. Generalrelative (talk) 01:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I see no need to persuade (edit: Also, persuade you about what? I am adding the second half of a quote that was cut off due to a poor reference used, what exactly do you need to be persuaded on?) you that I was right all along, the reference I added does that for me.  As for civility, you removed my completion of the quote with zero comment on the reversion. You reverted it AFTER I explained what the change was.  Again with zero comment.  Would you care to explain this? 99.106.93.88 (talk) 01:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You will at the very least need to persuade me or someone else here that your preferred addition is WP:DUE. I am not convinced that it does not represent WP:SENSATION. It certainly looks to be, even judging simply on the basis of its use of multiple exclamation points, which do not typically appear in encyclopedia articles. But in terms of content too, I am dubious that this remark would be seen by the community to satisfy WP:10YEARTEST. Generalrelative (talk) 01:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They were part of the full quote, but if you want to remove the extra exclamation points feel free. The quote should still be included. 99.106.93.88 (talk) 23:59, 28 May 2022 (UTC)