Talk:Jennifer Love Hewitt/Archive 1

Removed comment
"Hewitt's appeal was due primarily to her physical attractiveness" This is a personal opinion not a fact and should be deleted.Blaine411 19:21, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)
 * I would support such deletion. Anthony DiPierro 19:27, 24 Feb 2004


 * Can I know her measurements?Cuperdon 17:13, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

I don't think that statement can be seriously disputed.(UTC)


 * Why are Jennifer's looks being discussed in an encyclopedia, or even the talk page of an encyclopedia? I can't believe that some people are treating the talk page like a discussion board.  I recently had to remove a nonsensical comment about Hewitt's bossom.  Comments about her body should only be included if it is actually relevant.  Stiles 01:52, 4 March 2006 (UTC)


 * It could be confirmed if she was a model. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.150.36.30 (talk) 03:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC).

Misc comments
Oops, messed up my edit summary in that last edit: should have read "Sorry, I'm with Felix on this one, that sentence is vague and pointless, and the website linked to is 404". --Stormie 01:04, Jun 3, 2004 (UTC)

A picture
Hi. I really think a biographic article looks better with a picture on it. There's the issue of copyright though. I have come across [[Media:JenniferLoveHewitt.jpg|this image]] recently. I've just uploaded it to the website, but I thought it better to put it up for discussion here before I actually load it to the article. As far as I can tell, it's a promotional shot from her movie I Still Know What You Did Last Summer, and thus would constitute fair use. I also believe that the image is not one of those "spicy" (so to speak) images sometimes found on the net, and would qualify for illustrating a Wikipedia article. What about it? Regard, Redux 15:16, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Well, I think it's too big, and closer to a head shot would be more desirable perhaps? There has to be other promotional images out there? Maybe if we cropped it. zen master 16:33, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The size of the original image is not that important when it comes to the article. Remember, we can easily resize it to a more appropriate fit (maybe 90, 100px?), or simply make it a thumb. But if people would prefer a head shot, I can doctor the image myself, leaving only the head part in and then load the final product to the website. I don't know if doing that might actually bring up other copyright issues. Personally, I don't think that is really necessary, as long as the image is not too big on the article. That was the best image I could come up with. Other good images are usually from premieres or other events, and those are always copyrighted to some photographer or news agency. Redux 17:02, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)