Talk:Jennifer Turner (cricketer)

Requested move 19 December 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved Fuortu (talk) 10:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Jennifer Turner → Jennifer Turner (cricketer) – Was in that namespace before - moved with reason "no other article with this title". There are 2 musicians (one american (currently in draft, already available on several other musician pages (collaborations)) one new zealand), an author and several scientist - all more common names in search engine searches. common namespace pages like Jennifer Turner should be reserved for disambugation page &mdash; TGSTINT (talk) 09:27, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 10:19, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose personally I think until we have a another article, there is no need to disambiguate this. Listing for discussion. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 10:19, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose until there's another entry on WP that shares the same name.  Lugnuts  Precious bodily fluids 10:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Oppose. When there is another article that gets more pageviews than this one, we can do this move. Pandas and people (talk) 16:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I can't see Draft:Jennifer Turner (musician) surviving here, it could easily be deleted like the author Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Turner was. Having said that Jennifer Turner (cricketer) is a micro stub and the guitarist is mentioned in band articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * So a hatnote on a micro-stub would be enough to point to a band for a non-existant biography.  Lugnuts  Precious bodily fluids 19:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * in this case yes. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:08, 19 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose per above - Kinda pointless moving a one-lined article that probably doesn't even reach 10 views in a year, Waste of time moving. – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:01, 24 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 25 August 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Moved. Harrias  talk 08:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Jennifer Turner → Jennifer Turner (cricketer) – Second request for moving: Now that all of opposing arguments from the last request are no longer valid - as a Jennifer Turner (musician) page is 1. available 2.much more frequently visited than Jennifer Turner page (nearly 10 times as much after onyl a few months) 3.has gone up in google to first rank when searching that name. Contrary to the comment by In ictu oculi (which was nonsense anyway as In ictu oculi refers to a draft by a different author... the draft became an article.. Also the article even got more than myself as contributor already. I think that a lot of those landing on the current Jennifer Turner page actually are searching for the musician - not the cricketeer - so a move of that page to Jennifer Turner (cricketer) seems more than valid to me - even it is a "one-liner" - as due to the current status probably a lot of people land on the cricketeer page and then went on to the musicians. The article should not have been moved from (cricketeer) to name-only in the first place.... The currents page should either be the most searched and popular - which is the musician - or namespace pages like Jennifer Turner should be reserved for disambugation TGSTINT (talk) 13:49, 25 August 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. — usernamekiran (talk)   19:36, 1 September 2017 (UTC) @In ictu oculi WP:COI - seriously? I would be glad to hear any argument you see for that accusation. Or are you one of those people why WikiProject Editor Retention was created? See - I can accuse too - easily done... Notability? Seriously.. a) Notability has nothing to do with moving existing pages b) Check the provided sources - guess you surely went to libraries and checked the books and magazines used so you can tell about notability... c)If i compare to the articles you are working on... Any WP:COI there? - or why did articles which are stubs and oneliners ever get approved in terms of notability? So before you call other people names... But hey - isn't that all kind of off-topic and childish to piss on each others leg with no reason? Besides the fact that i never wrote you opposed - the word i used was "comment"... can we stay on topic? Lets just agree that all of us would like to improve wikipedia. So: It is a fact that Jennifer Turner (musician) has nearly 10 times more hits than Jennifer Turner after only a few months. It is a fact that search engine rank did raise by a ton. Also the reason to move Jennifer Turner (cricketer) to Jennifer Turner in the first place was "no other article with this title" - a reason that no longer is valid.
 * before you call other editors names check to see whether you have read what they said correctly. I didn't even oppose your move request the first time. Re Jennifer Turner (musician) still don't see any notability. Is there WP:COI? ‎ In ictu oculi (talk) 14:37, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Support if Jennifer Turner is changed to a disambiguation page with links to both Jennifer Turners. Hmlarson (talk) 04:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.