Talk:Jeremy Gardiner

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20121006233645/http://www.kingsplace.co.uk/jeremy-gardiner-unfolding-landscape-0 or some common source; and probably others too. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * In case there's any doubt about this: text added to the lead of the article on 8 January 2013 read:
 * while the presumed source, archived on 6 October 2012, read:
 * The artist's website also carries the same text, but is apparently not archived through archive.org. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 00:12, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Frank Opinions (talk) 18:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC) I have completely re-written it.
 * You now need to cite each and every fact to a reliable third party source. Theroadislong (talk) 18:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

COI
I have updated the article with additional references and believe it is now balanced and encyclopedic enough to remove the COI notice. More work would be welcome of course! — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 21:00, 1 September 2016 (UTC)