Talk:Jerome Corsi

No talk page entries on this article since 2018?!
That is not necessarily evidence of wrong-doing. It is somewhat surprising given the amount of information added to the article in the past few years. Also, it is odd, given that this guy is the focus of a lot of attention recently including plenty of additions to his BLP. Has an archive been lost or misplaced, I wonder?--FeralOink (talk) 00:11, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 * There's no indication of a lost archive. Talk pages are to discuss the article, not the topic. Editors generally agreeing (or not bothered enough to vocally disagree) about edits is common enough on Wikipedia. Weazie (talk) 19:56, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Neutral Point of View Needed!
In its current draft, this article is blatantly biased against Mr. Corsi. From the opening paragraph, you get a sense that the editors of the article have a negative point of view of his contributions. And it continues throughout the rest of the text. It's one-sided. The article should have a neutral-sounding opening paragraph highlighting his accomplishments. For example, "Jerome Corsi is a best-selling American author and holds a Ph.D. from Harvard University." Save phrases like, "attacked Democratic presidential candidates" for later in the article. But then it needs to be balanced with supporting comments in favor of Mr. Corsi's work.

To quote the Wikipedia article template, "An unbalanced article is one that does not fairly represent the balance of perspectives of high-quality, reliable secondary sources." In addition, "The personal views of Wikipedia editors or the public are irrelevant." This article needs editors from both sides of the table. MusicTree3 (talk) 05:34, 10 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The very first sentence notes two of Corsi's books were best sellers. Regardless, if you know of "high-quality, reliable secondary sources" that provide an alternative view, please feel free to include them in an edit. Weazie (talk) 20:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Put a different picture of him. Just because you disagree with someone doesn’t mean you should use an unflattering photo. 2601:280:5F80:CB90:51C7:C256:ABA2:C107 (talk) 05:31, 25 October 2023 (UTC)