Talk:Jerry B. Killian

Untitled
Could you perhaps, maybe, possibly quote the part of the article that says "some" because I could not find that. I may not know all the wikipedia rules, but I would guess that when something has such common knowledge amongst people that it is common sense, then a source would not be needed


 * I disagree that it is "common knowledge" that "most people" believe the documents are forgeries. If it is indeed common knowledge than it should be easy to find a source.  "Most" is inappropriate given the lack of such a source, and if you feel "some" is inappropriate as well, then we should just delete the part about forgeries. Gamaliel 04:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Why don't we change the wording to "and are widely considered to be" I think that would satisfy us both. Whadda ya think?

Should be deleted or merged with Killian documents
As much as I consider Jerry Killian to be a notable figure, almost nothing in this article actually pertains to his life. The article doesn't even know the year in which he was born and the last two paragraphs are more about the Killian documents than the man or his accomplishments. I propose this article redirect to the Killian documents.

Killian441 (talk) 03:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Did this --Killian441 (talk) 21:50, 9 April 2010 (UTC)