Talk:Jerzy Sikorski

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jerzy Sikorski. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100929123840/http://www.english.pan.pl/ to http://www.english.pan.pl/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:41, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

POV Check
The article needs to be checked for neutrality. There are sections that contain what appears to be uncited opinion. Wikipedia should never be using words like "slander" in our own voice. All opinion needs to be tied to a direct citation to a source.--Srleffler (talk) 02:44, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I removed the section that threw around accusations of slander. I have not yet reviewed the entire article.--Srleffler (talk) 06:07, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Tadeusz P. Wójcik
Tadeusz P. Wójcik, who is mentioned and cited in this article, appears to be its author. At File:Toruń of 1192 before first Teutonic Knights in 1231.jpg, user:Rosetecscc identifies himself as the copyright holder of the uploaded work, but the credit in the image itself is to Tadeusz P. Wójcik. I'm not sure whether Wójcik has a conflict of interest in editing this article, but he ought not to be citing his own work nor writing about himself on Wikipedia.--Srleffler (talk) 05:02, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Searching for Wójcik's 1990 reference led me to some videos online that refer to him and to "Rosetec Spatial Cybernetics Consortium". The content of the videos was somewhat helpful in evaluating the authorship of this article.--Srleffler (talk) 07:42, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Disaster area
This article appears to be a disaster area. It looks like the subject had his own ideas about Cop, which is fair enough, but the article is reporting them at vastly excessive length. For example, Cop's death-date belongs on the Cop page, not here. If JS has a novel (correct) theory that is accepted, it belongs there, with a note here. If he has a novel (incorrect, not accepted) theory then it could have a somewhat longer note here, but the status of the idea should be clear William M. Connolley (talk) 07:59, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Currently the Copernicus section is almost unreadable and poorly related to the subject. I note as well the extreme shortness of the Polish language article on the subject. Rmhermen (talk) 04:23, 5 October 2018 (UTC)