Talk:Jesse Eisenberg/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: DrStrauss (talk · contribs) 15:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Passed

 * 1. Well written?: Symbol support vote.svg Pass
 * 2. Verifiable?: Symbol support vote.svg Pass
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Symbol support vote.svg Pass
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Symbol support vote.svg Pass
 * 5. Stable?: Symbol support vote.svg Pass
 * 6. Images?: Symbol support vote.svg Pass

One very minor point: on the topic of school anxiety, another source would be good just for BLP verification but that's not a ground for rejecting it as a GA. Well done!

Dr Strauss  talk  15:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Reversing approval by novice reviewer
This was one of seven reviews posted within a 40 minute period. None of them were complete reviews; as the reviewer noted on his or her talk page, I didn't realise that GA was such a refined endeavour, rather just a sort of stamp.

The article still needs to be given a thorough review by a knowledgeable reviewer, so it has been put back into the reviewing pool. Any subsequent review will be done on a different review page. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)