Talk:Jessica Anderson (writer)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rosiestep (talk · contribs) 00:22, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

I'll start the review within a week. --Rosiestep (talk) 00:22, 11 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Lede
 * At just 4 sentences, the lede is too short and doesn't give an adequate overview of the article sections.


 * Early life
 * wl Queensland at first mention
 * The section's first sentence doesn't need to be a stand-alone paragraph.


 * Stories from the Warm Zone and Sydney Stories
 * "first and only autobiographical work": can you add a reference?


 * The Last Man's Head
 * I don't think the last sentence needs to be a stand-alone paragraph.


 * Further reading
 * Could use a trim

, Well done. There are few recommendations for improvement here, but please do ping me when you're ready for me to look at it again. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:38, 17 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I'll work my way through the review items and let you know when I'm ready for a re-review. Thanks.  Perry Middlemiss (talk) 23:49, 21 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your follow-up and the note on my talkpage. --Rosiestep (talk) 04:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Good job. Looks adequate for GA. --Rosiestep (talk) 04:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: