Talk:Jessica Carew Kraft

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (the author is the first female to publish a well-received book on rewilding and anarchism from a top-tier press) --Notinetwork (talk) 03:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it's all factual --2605:59C8:220C:BE10:30B4:D950:D4D2:F3EB (talk) 03:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * It's not tagged as a hoax; it tagged for failure to demonstrate significance or importance of the subject. —C.Fred (talk) 03:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the book is filled with citation backed factual information from a credited source --2601:200:4583:C4A0:C064:8B02:BF1B:A474 (talk) 03:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Are there any independent sources? The only source that isn't full-on primary is an interview with her. —C.Fred (talk) 03:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I poked around a bit on Google and there seems to be genuine recent regional coverage of her related to her 2023 book (just googling her name brings up a few links of such). Whether that's enough for WP:GNG and surviving AfD is another question, but maybe that's enough to un-speedy. Stefen Towers among the rest!   Gab • Gruntwerk 04:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * @2601:200:4583:C4A0:C064:8B02:BF1B:A474 Agreed. 93.7.178.33 (talk) 23:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Review of issues shown by templates
At best, the article hangs by a thread on all the concerns noted, with the thinnest thread being notability. The true independent, secondary coverage of the subject, Jessica Carew Kraft, is narrow in numbers, depth and time period. The article still mostly cites directly or indirectly to the subject's work, and it's generally hard to tell what coverage is genuinely independent from the subject, with just a couple exceptions. I think there should be generally more effort to address all the templates, to get to a point where none of the concerns are fuzzy. Stefen Towers among the rest!  Gab • Gruntwerk 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Also, I apologize if my reverting edit summary seemed harsh. I was thinking in terms of what has changed since I last looked at the article, and there seemed to be nothing significantly changed. Stefen Towers among the rest!   Gab • Gruntwerk 05:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)