Talk:Jessica Feshbach/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.'' Reviewer: AGK  [&bull; ] 14:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Happy to give this article GA status. AGK [&bull; ] 14:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Concisely written and clear.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Meets WP:V; no obvious factual errors or content of questionable accuracy.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Covers all aspects of the subject matter.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Satisfies WP:NPOV.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No ongoing edit wars or substantial expansion of the article.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No images used, but none appear to be available.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: