Talk:Jessica Yaniv

“Transgender activist”
Should be “self proclaimed”. I don’t think anyone takes this persons claims of being a genuine activist seriously.2A00:23C4:3E08:4001:E18D:6532:3617:8E87 (talk) 13:38, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, there's zero here to support that. Perhaps Firefangledfeathers would like to explain why they're re-adding such unsourced stuff to such a contentious topic?  Andy Dingley (talk) 01:13, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * It's supported by the first cited source at the end of the sentence, and more in the article body. I'll move some of the better ones up. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:27, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * A quote from Yaniv herself!
 * Yes, Yaniv is transgender. Yes, Yaniv might be described as an 'activist' (for some unbelievably dubious causes, which you and your tag-teamer are prolific at deleting-with-menaces). They have certainly acted as an activist in self promotion and in the supposed (yet legally stomped-flat) claims for their own personal benefit. But when has Yaniv ever behaved as an 'activist' for a 'transgender' cause, in any broader sense? Andy Dingley (talk) 01:31, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I am having trouble understanding both your words and your motives here, so I'm planning to disengage as much as possible. If anyone else has sourcing concerns, feel free to ping me. AD, if no one else weighs in, you might consider a post at WP:BLPN. Happy editing. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 01:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

"Male" Genitalia
Referring to male-typical genitalia on a female as "male genitalia" seems intentionally transphobic. 47.196.237.32 (talk) 01:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I agree. We should replace all instances of "male genitalia" with "her penis and scrotum." 98.118.115.80 (talk) 23:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * It still says "her male genitalia." As a trans person, this really bothers me. Will wikipedia go on supporting this intentional transphobia? 98.118.115.80 (talk) 20:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Lol. Well, I believe we should stick to what the reliable sources are saying when it coming to talking about what is between a person's legs. If they use the term "male genitalia", then who are we to talk over them? SparklyNights 02:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * How "reliable" can a source that refers to a woman's genitalia as "male" be? VeroniqueBellamy (talk) 06:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
 * We had an RfC about this back in 2021, which ended in consensus to use "male genitalia". Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

New charges
02-Mar-2022 CC - 502(2) app: replace undertaking form 10 w/release order (1 count)

25-Feb-2022 CCC-266 Assault (1 count)

25-Feb-2022 CCC - 437 false alarm of fire (2 counts)

25-Feb-2022 CC - 140(1)(c) Reporting an offence committed when it was not (3 counts)

BC Judge J. Solomon has just handed down the latest ruling in a series of convictions for the self-proclaimed trans activist Jessica Serenity Simpson. Simpson, formerly Jonathan Yaniv, has been found guilty of public mischief for pulling a fire alarm for false purposes. The incident occurred last Spring after a dog that Simpson claims is her service dog became unruly in a common area of a retirement home, the residence of Simpson's elderly mother. After repeatedly asking for Simpson to remove the dog, a 70-year-old man named Gerald Funke, who is dependent on a walker, was met by a forceful push from Simpson after moving the dog from off of a chair. Another man intervened to stop the altercation. Simpson called 911 and falsely claimed to have been assaulted by Mr. Funke, which Judge Solomon today acknowledged as a lie. Simpson also pulled the fire alarm, which the defence attorney argued was done out of fear for Simpson’s life. While Judge Solomon agreed that Simpson pushed Mr. Funke away from the dog with harder force than was necessary, his ruling found that “the Crown has failed to prove the accused guilt beyond a reasonable doubt” and thus Simpson was not guilty of assault. Simpson has had three prior convictions, including being found guilty of assaulting my former colleague, Keean Bexte. The assault took place while he was covering a hearing discussing Simpson's brandishing of a prohibited weapon on the YouTube channel for political commentator Blair White. Jubez1 (talk) 04:05, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

2021 Defamation case
On July 12, 2022 Justice Warren Milman of the BC Supreme core dismissed a defamation launched by Jessica Simpson against Rebel News Network Ltd. Simpson launched the case in April 2021 and sought damages and relief from statements allegedly made by Rebel News which damaged her reputation and vilified her as a person. Justice Milman cited Simpsons tendency to engage in a public area as well as her extensive history of using legal processes or threats of legal action to silence criticism against her as being problematic, and while clouded at times the coverage by Rebel news was in fact in the interest of the public. The claims made by Simpson were weak,

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.3.3.122 (talk) 03:15, 13 January 2024 (UTC)