Talk:Jesu, meine Freude/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 15:50, 3 November 2014 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Writing is solid, and no copyvios present.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I have only intermediate knowledge of German, but I was able to understand the German language sources enough to confirm that they do support the content in the article.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Focused on the subject, but also provides enough historical context.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Presented in a very neutral, encyclopedic fashion.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Highly stable, single-author article.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The image of Johann Crüger had a small licensing tag problem (which I've found is extremely pervasive in Commons) where it was tagged for use in European countries, but not the US. I updated the tag to include the US under the public domain license. This does not greatly affect the article in any way, so it shouldn't bias this review.
 * 1) Overall: Well done. I couldn't find any problems with the article.-- &iquest;3fam  ily6  contribs 16:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:25, 6 November 2014 (UTC)