Talk:Jeung Lai-chuen

Interesting...
...that none of the baying mob demanding that the AFD be reopened actually got around to making a case for deletion. SpinningSpark 11:53, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * "baying mob"? That was as orderly and well considered deletion review as I've seen, as noted by the last comment in it. And there is no obligation on anyone to comment in each and every deletion discussion on an article; every discussion is different, and editors may feel their time is better served participating in discussions where they can make a difference or have something new to contribute.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 12:44, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * As I said at the DRV "If you want to challenge Cunard's sources, then fine reopen the debate. But if you just want to reopen the debate because vote counting comes to a different answer that would just be wasting everyone's time." It seems people wanted the second one.  Next time I won't cave in to a relist demand so easily. SpinningSpark 14:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jeung Lai Chuen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150102120622/http://taipinginstitute.com/menu-styles/ln/pak-mei-kuen to http://taipinginstitute.com/menu-styles/ln/pak-mei-kuen

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:19, 22 April 2017 (UTC)