Talk:Jewish Territorial Organization

Article name
a) ITO has a clear name: Jewish Territorial Organisation, so "Territorial", not "Territorialist". Please make correction.

b) ITO, as a British-based organisation, must be written with "s": J. T. Organi*s*ation.

Arminden (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Arminden

End of ITO
Territorialism article states that ITO was dissolved in 1925. This article gives the year 1943. Neither brings any citation.Arminden (talk) 16:47, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Arminden


 * According Gur Alroey (2011) it was dissolved in 1925. There were other movements that promoted similar ideas. I added a short explanation Dolly City (talk) 20:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jewish Territorialist Organization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120204070020/http://www.music.princeton.edu/~newton/notyet/index.html to http://www.music.princeton.edu/~newton/notyet/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:15, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Page title is "Organization", but lead sentence is "Organisation" with an S -- which name is true?
2A00:23C5:FE18:2701:B8B3:3830:8637:5533 (talk) 19:06, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Jewish Territorialism - new topic?
In other languages (even in simple English), Jewish Territorialism is separate from the Jewish Territorial Organization. What's more, a substantial part of this article also doesn't deal with the organization, which only existed between 1905-1925, but with the idea of territorialism. Does it make sense to create a new article just for territorialism? Thanks! Dolly City (talk) 19:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I just agree. Its not a good idea for a lexica to mix different topics. Who is just doing it? Martin Mair (talk) 18:51, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Seperate articles for the other organisations
I strongly suggest to put the text about the freeman league into a seperate article. The otehr organisations too. Martin Mair (talk) 18:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)