Talk:Jigoku (film)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jigokuposter.jpg
Image:Jigokuposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Missing sections
This article is missing information on the film's release and reception. These missing sections should be added to the article in order to completely cover its subject, reviews from notable critics should be added in a reception section, and information on the film's theatrical and home media releases should be added in a release section as well.--Paleface Jack (talk) 03:30, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Expansion
This article is way too short and is under-sourced and needs to be expanded in more detail than what it currently has. More information on the film's production needs to be added with more detail on the film's development, writing, and filming. There is also no information on the film's release, reception, and controversy due to it's graphic content. This is important information and needs to be added to the article so that it meets Wikipiedia's standards of a well developed article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 20:56, 20 October 2015 (UTC)