Talk:Jill Stuart

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
 * http://www.apakistannews.com/ny-fashion-week-ss09-wrap-up-ii-80775
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Substantial developments to this article
Following a recent deletion discussion, I've worked quickly to bring this article up to a more acceptable standard in terms of referencing and information, also adding further images and categories. Further improvements welcome – especially a DOB. A quick look at the number of pages that link to it indicates that it is worth updating and improving as and when further information becomes available. Libby norman (talk) 15:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Suggestion of merge of Jill Stuart Design
This is effectively a second article on the same topic but with the wrong title and I suggested a deletion. Another editor has suggested a merge of the two articles. I'm not sure there is much valid information in Jill Stuart Design that isn't already in Jill Stuart. Some information looks to me not to be usable due to poor and non third party sources. If anyone can see any information with refs that can be usefully added perhaps they can discuss it here – bearing in mind that Jill Stuart was flagged for deletion on 4 Oct but pulled back by the inclusion of more and better information with sources. I'd hate to see bad/unsourced information creep back in from another article. Libby norman (talk) 19:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)