Talk:Jim B. Tucker

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jim B. Tucker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090109150408/http://www.wpr.org/book/051120a.html to http://www.wpr.org/book/051120a.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090608020209/http://www.nhne.org/news/NewsArticlesArchive/tabid/400/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/5759/Default.aspx to http://www.nhne.org/news/NewsArticlesArchive/tabid/400/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/5759/Default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Jim B. Tucker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090604045719/http://www.storyhousepro.com/section/science to http://www.storyhousepro.com/section/science
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926213429/http://www.five.tv/programmes/extraordinarypeople/boywholived/ to http://www2.five.tv/programmes/extraordinarypeople/boywholived/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090216053351/http://lifebeforelife.com/Publications.htm to http://lifebeforelife.com/Publications.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708172128/http://archive.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2005/08/31.html to http://archive.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2005/08/31.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:42, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Neutrality
This article is a bit unbalanced in that it only has one comment from critics of his work, which is quickly dismissed without any detail that might help a reader decide which claim is more credible. There's a lot more coverage at Reincarnation, though scientific reaction to Tucker specifically, whether positive or negative, would be helpful here. -- Beland (talk) 06:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree that article could better conform to WP:FRINGE. Edits like this haven’t helped. - LuckyLouie (talk) 14:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Seriously, whether he is right or wrong, how can this article possibly ever become "neutral", when his research relates to the religious and existential convictions of so many visitors and editors? It will always boil down to how agressive the "debunking" will be allowed to be.--Berig (talk) 07:46, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia does not itself debunk. If there are qualified sources criticizing him, then as much of this criticism as possible should be reported in his Wikipedia entry. If there are counter-criticisms, those should be reported too. The more information there is from either side, the better. Don Ecchi (talk) 22:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)