Talk:Jim Banks

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jim Banks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402134634/http://jgweb.sx.atl.publicus.com/article/20140305/LOCAL0202/140309674 to http://jgweb.sx.atl.publicus.com/article/20140305/LOCAL0202/140309674

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Reverted Controversy Section
Just came here to add the details reverted in revision 919300755. This does not appear to be WP:OR: while I did not listen to the audio files I read the transcript of the interview and the host ends with the following remark: "We feel we must note that Congressman Banks did not accurately describe The New York Times reporting about Congressman Schiff and the whistleblower's complaint. The Times quoted a spokesman for Congressman Schiff who said Schiff never saw any part of the complaint or knew precisely what the whistleblower would deliver." The reverted content seems accurate. Did the reverter consult any of the citations? Cl.taurus (talk) 22:06, 3 October 2019 (UTC)


 * You are referring to my reversion of an edit by IP 32.214.158.236 who added a section "Lying to the press", right? Are you saying that there is a reliable source saying that Mr Banks lied, and a reliable source that there's a controversy about it? (In fact you'd need multiple reliable sources if WP:BLPPUBLIC applies.) Yes, I consulted the cite of the Times, though I did not listen to the audio, and do not see the transcript. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 23:00, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Jim Banks
Was surprised to see the blatant editorializing in the article regarding the political career of the Congressman. Certainly this isn't considered acceptable within Wikipedia or am I wrong.

Update:

Looks like someone got a few of them. Of course there are more. Check under Tenure. Thank you.

2603:6010:750B:BD23:8D15:8A5A:C078:90BF (talk) 20:16, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

2603:6010:750B:BD23:1164:786D:559B:9DE9 (talk) 19:04, 27 August 2021 (UTC)