Talk:Jim Furyk's round of 58

Level of detail
In checking this article over for DYK, I noticed that the description of the round is extremely detailed, at a level I don't believe to be appropriate for Wikipedia. Given that it's sourced, and not promotional in tone, I'm not going to hold up the DYK, but this is something the writers should take another look at. Also, there are a considerable number of technical golf terms that most readers will be unfamiliar with; these need links. I've got a few, but there's more. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:22, 3 October 2019 (UTC)