Talk:Jim Himes

Political bias
It seems like each of the issues listed here is an approval rating for liberal litmus tests, almost as if in order to reiterate "100% 100% 100%." For example, it's taken here as patently axiomatic that a Brady group rating of 100% is the criterion by which to gauge positively, period. Someone without that bias, on the other hand, could as easily observe he has an NRA rating of 0% for example. And no one questions this. This seems to me like a naked reveal of serious POV flaws in this article. At very minimum you would think the authors, not implausibly from the guy's office or campaign working off of private accounts, would include that as just one example as, if nothing else, a fig leaf of pretense of NPOV. It'd be nice to know such objectivity questions were welcomed at WP instead of to be shouted down, as is not uncommon these days. Just sayin'. 69.144.93.138 (talk) 69.144.93.138 (talk) 06:56, 8 October 2023 (UTC)