Talk:Jim Kimsey

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

no consensus to move, as per the discussion below. It was proposed that the article Jim Kimsey should be moved to James Kimsey because "James is his real name even though he is called Jim". This is the discussion that followed. Dekimasu よ! 03:04, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose. For article titles, we generally use the name under which a subject is best known, rather than the full/proper name. As such, "Jim Kimsey" seems to be the correct choice here. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 15:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose as above. The present balance, with the full name in bold in the first line, is both traditional and right. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jim Kimsey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070916225207/http://www.kimseyfoundation.org/jameskimsey.htm to http://www.kimseyfoundation.org/jameskimsey.htm
 * Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20021017022748/http://www.kimseyfoundation.org/ to http://www.kimseyfoundation.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)