Talk:Jim Matkin

[Untitled]
Read over the article in light of the banner that says it was either an autobiography or had been extensively edited by the subject or by someone close to the subject. I think the only surviving edits that may be by the subject are the reference to the Knox fellowship and LLM, the name of the judge that the subject articled for, the picture of the subject speaking at a lecturn, and the list of publications. All appear factual. Much of the rest is material I found in secondary sources and uploaded. I'm not known to the subject.RWIR (talk) 08:20, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Seems to be promoting the "fossil fuels" are not the cause of global warming
Authored document

Leading scientists who discredit alarmism are growing in numbers and impact. "The work of science has nothing to do with consensus."

Top 5%1986 Views323 Pages 1 File ▾

Strong evidence of a counter consensus is documented by Dr. Alan Longhurst in his tour de force book Doubt and Certainty in Climate Science. I think the following insight by Alan Longhurst unravels the alarmist’s failed predictions, as their models are too simple like a one trick pony in a big complex circus - I became troubled by what seemed to be a preference to view the climate as a global stable state, unless perturbed by anthropogenic effects, rather than as a highly complex system having several dominant states, each having a characteristic return period imposed on gradual change at millennial scale. “Precisely the very unscientific folly and bias of the climate-change crowd. Free pdf book is available here - https://www.academia.edu/35571845/DOUBT_AND_CERTAINTY_IN_CLIMATE_SCIENCE_https_curryja.files.wordpress.com_2015_09_longhurst-print.pdf New book: Doubt and Certainty in Climate Science Posted on September 20, 2015 by curryja | 561 Comments by Judith Curry Doubt and Certainty in Climate Science is an important new book that everyone should read. And its free. It is a privilege to make available to you the book Doubt and Certainty in Climate Science, by Alan Longhurst [link Longhurst print to download the book]. The book is 239 pages long, with 606 footnotes/references. The book is well written, technical but without equations – it is easily accessible to anyone with a technical education or who follows the technical climate blogs. In this post I provide a brief overview of the book, biosketch of Alan Longhurst, some additional backstory on the book, and my own comments on the book. Preface The Preface provides some interesting history, here are some excerpts: But more recently, I became troubled by what seemed to be a preference to view the climate as a global stable state, unless perturbed by anthropogenic effects, rather than as a highly complex system having several dominant states, each having a characteristic return period imposed on gradual change at mill …View full abstract

https://www.academia.edu/40107819/CLIMATE_CORRUPTION_spurs_a_fake_global_warming_crisis_by_waging_war_on_carbon_Lies_conflating_Co2_with_pollution_make_fossil_fuels_the_enemy_Fearsome_yet_false_predictions_of_sea_rise_cause_a_group_think_panic_like_yelling_FIRE_in_a_crowded_theater?email_work_card=interaction-paper Rpauli (talk) 18:13, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Heavy promoter of "fake global warming crisis"
CLIMATE CORRUPTION spurs a fake global warming crisis by waging war on carbon. Lies conflating Co2 with pollution make fossil fuels the enemy. Fearsome yet false predictions of sea rise cause a group think panic like yelling FIRE in a crowded theater.

JAMES MATKIN CLIMATE CORRUPTION spurs a fake global warming crisis. The deliberate deception is the conflation of Man-made atmospheric CO2 with pollution. China scientists warn of global cooling. August 15, 2019 at 12:35 am | # This article is an excellent summary of why there is no human made global warming for governments to vainly try to stop. Think about it, we live in the Quaternary Ice Age Holocene Optimum interglacial why do we not welcome global warming to save us from the next devastating glaciation? Yes, Co2 is only a trace gas impossible physically to cover the earth like a greenhouse because…..”a mathematical analysis shows that the human produced carbon dioxide concentrations are so low as to be unmeasurable and there is no correlation to the increases in carbon dioxide and man’s burning of fossil fuels.” In the 1995 2nd Assessment Report of the UN IPCC the scientists included these three statements in the draft: 1. “None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed (climate) changes to the specific cause of increases in greenhouse gases.” 2. “No study to date has positively attributed all or part (of observed climate change) to anthropogenic (i.e. man-made) causes.” 3. “Any claims of positive detection of significant climate change are likely to remain controversial until uncertainties in the natural variability of the climate system are reduced.” Those three statements by ‘scientists’ above were replaced by non scientists with this political swindle: “The balance of evidence suggests a discernable human influence on global climate.” This story explains why the warmists want no debate falsly claiming the science is settled. “The HOLOCENE OPTIMUM is called an “optimum” because it was warmer than it is now. Since that best of times, temperature has been falling by 0.25°C per thousand years and water has become locked up in the ice sheets, causing sea level to fall. Which is what happening before we plunge into a g …View full abstract Rpauli (talk) 19:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)