Talk:Jim McGovern (American politician)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * very well written. Excellent flow to the article
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Sources appear in order
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Hits all the key issues without delving into minute ones.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Could use more images, but that's not a reason to fail GA.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Excellent work.  ~DC  We Can Work It Out 18:00, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Excellent work.  ~DC  We Can Work It Out 18:00, 4 October 2010 (UTC)