Talk:Jimi's Book of Japanese: A Motivating Method to Learn Japanese

[Untitled]
Not only does this read a bit too much like an advertisement, but when I tried to wikify the list of awards, I couldn't find a single relevant Wikipedia article. We might be bumping into notability issues here... - dcljr (talk) 06:35, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't think it reads like an advertisement at all. As far as the awards, there are several areas to view the awards: I.D. Magazine, Parents' Choice website, Independent Publishers' Association, as well as AIGA Atlanta chapter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.56.53.50 (talk • contribs)


 * Fair enough, but can you provide links to Wikipedia articles about these things? - dcljr (talk) 17:56, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't know the subtleties of the wikipedia, but as a naive user, it sure looks like an ad. It was actually jarring to come across this entry. Nihongo dilettante

I also think this article reads like an advertisement. It may not even be notable enough for an entry: a Google search for "Jimi's Book of Japanese" gets less than 5,000 hits, almost none of which are from educational institution websites! Unless some editor can demonstrate sufficient notability, I suggest the article be deleted. Even if sufficient notability is demonstrated, I still think the article needs to be rewritten in a more encyclopaedic/neutral tone. 203.173.46.125 09:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Absolutely, not true. THere are over 86,000 hits on Google. Furthermore, there is no reference that this is purely an education book; therefore, your comment on not getting hits from educational institutions is immaterial. Your opinion is just that, an opinion and highly subjective.
 * It is nothing but an advertiesment and has no place on Wikipedia. [Piebaldcat]


 * Thank you for your concern about the article Piebaldcat however I'd like to refer you to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_blank_pages
 * If you believe the article meets the requirements for deletion then nominate it for deletion in the appropriate way. Thanks so much.
 * RecentlyAnon (talk) 22:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * "THere are over 86,000 hits on Google." Nonsense: http://www.google.com/search?q="Jimi's Book of Japanese" 203.173.16.199 (talk) 05:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)